Franchise Vs Company Owned Growth

Franchise Vs Company Owned Growth

While business owners are always confronted with the options of whether to expand their businesses through franchising or through their own stores. We help them analyze and take a very careful call on the future of their businesses to understand the franchise vs company-owned pros and cons suitability. A quick snapshot of why you must choose to franchise over-owned unit expansion is given below. However, we would like to discuss in detail your present business. Thus, give you our customized expert opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of franchising your business.

Let us see the difference in franchise vs company Owned growth:

Spread the business across different geographies

Franchising often enables companies with one or a few locations to quickly establish a national presence within a few years, achieving a rate of network growth, which would be inconceivable through company-funded development. The resources you will need to contribute to the opening of a franchised outlet are far less than if you were opening a company-owned store – the franchisee funds the premises lease acquisition and interiors, recruits and trains the staff, and implements the local marketing campaign.

This enables you to develop a compact management base focused on assisting multiple franchisees to launch their business simultaneously. Rather than methodically opening store after store and sourcing new start-up capital for each. This ensures that while you concentrate on the back end to support the growth of the business as the franchisor. Then your franchisee is engaged with the consumer and servicing them. Thus, defining clearly 2 different ends of business being done by specialized people meant to do the same.

Entrepreneurial Management

By granting a franchise license you are placing your franchise under the ownership of an individual with specialist local market knowledge who is, in essence, his or her own boss. Their earnings depend entirely upon the success of their own endeavors. As opposed to a salaried manager whose earnings (leaving the bonuses besides) are unrelated to their performance. Also, the Franchise Agreement always ensures the franchisee from leaving. To use your business concept and systems to set up in competition for a significant period of time. Whereas, a staff member is under no such restriction and can always very comfortably move on to the competition. That apart, the biggest gainer is the entrepreneurial management that takes ownership of the franchise. This provides an edge to the services being offered which when used effectively does wonders to the business.

Franchise Vs Company Owned: Revenues & Return on Investment

Franchisees pay an initial investment to purchase a franchise. The most of which will be to cover the costs involved in franchisee recruitment, training, and launch support. Your real return would be the ongoing royalty or your share of profit in the cost of the product or service sold. Hence, which is a percentage of the franchisee’s turnover paid to cover the costs of ongoing support. Also includes the cost of product research and development, national marketing campaigns. Moreover, provide a fair reward for the use of your intellectual property and ongoing efforts. Because there is less capital employed, your profits are generated on a much lower capital investment. Although the revenue received from franchised units is logically less than that from 100% company-owned outlets. A higher percentage of the revenue is actual profit.

By speeding up expansion your business network achieves higher economies of scale earlier. Thus, stronger brand awareness is much sooner able to challenge for national contracts. In the case of a fledgling market or economic downturn, it is in a much better position to capture early market leadership. So, to establish a dominant position over its competitors.